Marie Antoinette – A Biography
- At July 01, 2009
- By Clare
- In Articles, Biography
219

Marie Antoinette was the beautiful Queen of France who became a symbol for the wanton extravagance of the 18th century monarchy, and was stripped of her riches and finery, imprisoned and beheaded by her own subjects during the French Revolution that began in 1789.
As her life began there was little hint of this total reversal of life’s fortunes. Marie Antoinette was born in 1755 at very apex of the European social pyramid.
She was born a princess and archduchess, the 15th daughter of Maria Teresa, Empress of Austria. The Hapsburg house of Austria was the oldest royal house of Europe, and the young princess enjoyed the relaxed environment of the Schonbrünn Palace and the indulgence of tutors her parents, brothers and sisters.
Marie Thérèse was famous Austrian empress who counted among her many accomplishments her ability to marry her many children in ways strategic to the Austrian empire. So it was with Marie Antoinette. For this daughter, Marie Thérèse arranged a special marriage to cement the new alliance with France that she had concluded with Louis XV. So, Marie Antoinette was to leave Austria to the most prestigious throne in all Europe.
French Queen
The life of Marie Antoinette was the stuff of dreams when she was married at age 14 to the crown prince of France, the dauphin. France was then the most powerful nation of continental Europe, and the royal palace at Versailles the most opulent. The young princess could hardly have hoped for a more prestigious marriage and her magnificent marriage ceremony in 1770 was unmatched in royal pageantry.
At the border she was stripped and re-dressed with clothing fashionable at the French court. When she was presented to the French king Louis XV, he pronounced her delightful, and told others of her fine full figure, of which he much approved. She became dauphine surrounded by all the comforts of the French court.
Her enchanted life reached its pinnacle when the old king died and her husband became King Louis XVI in 1774. Marie Antoinette, still a teenager became Queen of France.
Unhappy Marriage and Boredom
But this daughter of life’s fortune was unhappy in her marriage. Louis was homely, awkward and hardly her heart’s desire. His devotion to the hunt, clocks and his workshop and his early hours were in contrast to her pursuit of the arts, fashion, dance and French nightlife. The contrast of Charles and Diana comes to mind. While King Louis XV, her husband’s brothers, Provence and Artois, and others at court noticed at once her grace and beauty, her own shy husband was slow to exercise the rights of the marriage bed. From afar, Louis XVI, like the others, much admired Marie’s physical charms and her character, and Louis would become a thoroughly devoted husband, but in her early years in France he was little comfort to her.
Pushed by her mother’s letters, Marie still sought out Louis. Yet, to add to Antoinette’s frustration, even when she could achieve intimacy with him, Louis was unable to achieve erection. So, Antoinette and Louis were unable to have sex and their marriage went unconsummated for seven years. It took the intervention of the Queen’s oldest brother, emperor Joseph of Austria, in a heart to heart meeting with Louis in 1777, to convince him to have the needed operation. Meanwhile, the teenage queen suffered in silence as she was snidely taunted for her inability to produce an heir to the throne.
Beyond her personal frustrations with her husband, Marie Antoinette was bored with her position and its duties. The days of the young princess and then queen were spent in endless court rituals and strict etiquette tracing to the days of Louis XIV.
The young queen tired of being constantly on public display with the requirements of her position. She missed the more relaxed environment and freedom of Vienna. Her displeasure and sarcasm directed at the older aunts and members of the high nobility were noticed and commented upon.
Circle of Friends
Marie Antoinette sought escape from her marital frustration and the boredom of court life. Time went by and she began to exercise power as queen, Marie Antoinette spent less time at court, and surrounded herself with a dissolute clique, led by Yolande de Polignac and Thérèse de Lamballe. She lavished expensive gifts and positions upon these friends and in doing so ignored the great houses of the French nobility.
With her young friends, Marie Antoinette threw herself into a life of pleasure and careless extravagance. These included masked balls in Paris, gambling, theatricals and late night promenades in the park. Her circle included the King’s frivolous young brother the Count of Artois, and handsome young courtiers the Duc de Ligne, Counts Dillon, Vaudreuil and Axel Fersen.
The Queen’s indiscretions with her circle of friends led to scandals such as the Diamond Necklace Affair and rumours concerning her relations with that circle including Axel Fersen.
Extravagant Life
The young queen, with her blonde beauty and style set fashion trends through France and Europe. Her painter Vigee Lebrun commented about the translucent colour of her complexion, her long blonde hair and her well-proportioned and full-bosomed figure. All commented how well she carried herself. Her page Tilly said she walked better than any woman and as you’d offer a woman a chair, you’d offer her a throne.
The queen enjoyed her beauty style, but her fashion fame came at a price. The Queen spent lavishly on her dress and adornments. Each year she exceeded her clothing allowance which the King covered. The excessive fashions for high headdresses, plumes and voluminous dresses were subject to public comment, caricature and on occasion ridicule.
The queen also spent lavishly on her friends as mentioned and on her entertainment including her retreat at Petit Trianon. This small palace adjoining Versailles was given to Marie by Louis XVI. There she arranged extensive interior decorations and building of a theatre for her theatricals and the Temple of Love in the park.
Marie also had built a rustic Viennese retreat called the hameau. Here, she played at being at being a simple milkmaid. To add to the fun, Sevres porcelain bowls were cast using Marie Antoinette’s own ample breasts as their mould (as was said to have had been done in the case of Helen of Troy). The hameau was stocked with perfumed sheep and goats, but the actual milking and chores were done by servants.
Anger at the Queen
By the late 1780s, envy and hatred of Marie Antoinette were widespread. Many at court had always opposed the Austrian alliance, and had resented her efforts to intercede on occasion for Austrian causes.
The king’s brother the Count of Provence and his cousin the Count of Orleans both thought they were more capable than Louis XVI. They were jealous both of Louis’s kingship and his marriage to the beautiful Marie Antoinette.
Many others among the nobility were envious of the Queen and insulted by her dismissal of court etiquette, preference for her small court circle and the patronage she wielded on their behalf. Thus, disaffected members of the nobility became fertile sources for dirt on the queen. They fabricated and circulated scurrilous stories about the Queen and her private life. Stories accused of all sort of sexual acts with men and women of the court, of sending funds to Austria, and challenged the paternity of the royal children.
Diamond Necklace Affair
By the mid 1780s tales of the queen’s extravagance, dissipation and sexual vice abounded. It was at this point that the Diamond Necklace Affair became the sensation, grabbing the attention of the entire nation.
The affair fused three disparate situation, united by widely held beliefs in the loose morals of Marie Antoinette. For years an impoverished scion of past Valois nobility, Madame Lamotte schemed to gain a position at court. At the same time, socially prominent Prince de Rohan, the Cardinal of France was unhappy over his years of exclusion from Marie Antoinette’s inner circle, and the jeweller Boehmer was unable to convince Marie Antoinette to buy a fabulously expensive diamond necklace originally made for Louis XV’s lover Madame du Barry.
Lamotte was a full-figured attractive woman who caught the attention of both men, and was able to convince them she was a lesbian lover of Marie Antoinette. Lamotte convinced Rohan that the Queen indeed wanted the necklace and Rohan obtained it from Boehmer and gave it to Lamotte after meeting a prostitute dressed as Marie Antoinette at a late night rendezvous near the Temple of Love, where the Queen was said to hold lovers’ trysts with others.
When Boehmer approached the Queen for payment (just as she was preparing for to play a role in a banned Beaumarchais play Le Figaro), the charade unravelled. When they learned the basic facts of the affair, both king and queen were enraged that Rohan would think that the queen would use a go-between to obtain a necklace.
Necklace Trial and Impact
Royal pique proved disastrous. The cardinal, highest churchman in France, was arrested on the Day of Assumption in the middle of the entire court. Next the Queen demanded public vindication, so the king obtained a trial before the Parlement of Paris.
The trial proved a sensation for months, with the dirty laundry of the monarchy paraded before all France. The cast included the highest nobles, charlatans, a prostitute who looked like the Queen, and above all the fabulous diamond necklace and the Queen herself despite never being called as witness. In the end, the nobility displayed their defiance before the entire nation in the Diamond Necklace Affair with their acquittal of Prince de Rohan on the charge of insulting the queen. The ruling of the Parlement of Nobles effectively said that at the least, given her reputation, the queen was worthy of such insult. Rohan could reasonably believe Marie Antoinette would use him as a go-between and in the end exchange her sexual favours for a diamond necklace.
When the not guilty verdict was announced in the crowded Paris opera house an enormous roar went up and all eyes turned to the royal box. A shocked Marie Antoinette hastily departed for her coach, amid the crowd’s hoots.
The court did convict the less well-connected Lamotte, and she was branded on her breasts and imprisoned. But her husband had escaped to England and she escaped prison. She exacted her revenge by concocting and circulating a tale that she was indeed the queen’s lesbian lover, that the queen was insatiable in her desires and that the queen got the necklace and the affair was all for her amusement. As fabulous as her story was, it circulated in the thousands and was widely believed. So much so that had she not died in 1793, Lamotte might well have testified against Marie at her trial.
Madame Deficit and Financial Crisis
Ironically, as the Diamond Necklace Affair erupted and the Queen’s popularity sank to its nadir, age and maturity tempered her lifestyle. Louis and Marie were able to have children and Antoinette bore four children. She spent less time with Paris night life and more with her children and family. Though still graceful and attractive, as she passed age thirty, Marie’s increasingly stout figure moved her toward darker colours. Her milliner Madame Bertin used less ostentatious fashion, while still showing Marie’s large bust to fine advantage. Even as she still flirted with men of court and spent much time with Axel Fersen, Louis was increasingly devoted to his handsome wife whom he adored.
While Marie’s personal life was settling down, the state of France was not. France also had bad harvests in the late 1780s and the poor suffered. The Queen was good-hearted and kindly and tried to aid the poor of her country. She attended benefits for charity (including the night the Necklace verdict was announced), and used the hameau to aid a number of impoverished families. However, her small acts were hardly noticed amid the suffering. What was remembered was that the queen played at being a milkmaid and shepherdess, at the manicured hameau of Trianon, while real peasants starved. Her perceived insensitivity led many to believe she said “Let them eat cake”, when told of the widespread starvation.
Furthermore, France reeled under huge debts inherited from Louis XV which Louis XVI had been unable to repay. France’s debt was now a crisis, with the final straw being its France’s costly aid from 1778 to 1783 to the American colonies in their War of Independence with Great Britain. To try to revive the Queen’s popularity and rally support for the monarchy portraits were made and exhibited showing the Queen surrounded by her loving children. Yet the obvious royal propaganda backfired as detractors noticing the Queen’s expansive costume, dubbed the pictured heroine, “Madame Deficit”.
It was at this time, amid such increased unpopularity and still reeling from the aftershocks of the Necklace Affair, when Louis XVI most needed support from the nobility. He tried to effect needed reforms through a series of ministers, relying in each instance on advice from his Queen, and then he called an assembly of notables to again try to effect reforms to deal with the financial crisis. Louis was not a forceful king, his wife’s influence was resented and the position of the monarchy weakened.
Estates General – 1789
Tragedy struck Louis and Marie in 1789. Their oldest son and heir, the dauphin, was dying of a crippling, agonizing hereditary disease and would die in June. Besides her miscarriages, this was the second child dead; their second daughter had died in 1786. And now amid this grief, the couple faced the crisis that now threatened their rule, which would bring still further tragedies to this family.
Unable to force the nobility to make needed financial reforms, the desperate king called the Estates General in May 1789. This was the first time in 175 years it was called. But it was unique because it gave representation to common men, as one of the three estates able to vote. Louis did this to try to gain the support of the common people (third estate) to force needed reforms.
The Estate General did not begin auspiciously as the Queen’s appearance was met first by silence and then call Vive Duc Orleans – her scorned suitor and hated foe. This rebelliousness was a sign of what was to follow. The common people were not content with the limited role of the third estate Louis envisioned. The genie was now out of the bottle. The third estate declared itself the national assembly and in the Tennis Court Oath said it would not adjourn until France had a constitution.
Fall of the Bastille
Louis lacked the will to quell this rebellion but was repeatedly lobbied to take action by Marie Antoinette. The queen strongly desired to preserve absolute monarchy and was firm in her opposition to reforms that would give greater power to the common people.
However, with a taste of success, the common people did not want to see the third estate suppressed. In July, a mob of commoners seized the Invalides and obtained a supply of fire arms. The next effort was to obtain powder so they could defend the assembly as needed. For this effort the mob attacked a great symbol of absolute monarchy, the ancient and famous Bastille prison and fortress that loomed in the centre of Paris.
Louis failed to take prompt action and the mob succeeded in taking the Bastille. The governor of the Bastille who resisted and threatened to blow up the gun powder was hacked to death by the mob his head sported on pikes for all to see. The crowd had arms and ammunition. Lawlessness had occurred and no royal action had been taken in response. Louis went to Paris to restore calm but no actions were taken against those who stormed the Bastille.
The Great Fear
The storming of the Bastille greatly disturbed a number of nobles who knew the poverty of the common people and feared vengeance if royal power was inadequate to check mob impulses. Leading members of the royal court, including close friends of Marie Antoinette fled the country. These included in July and August the Count of Artois and Madame Polignac and in October her close friend and portraitist Vigee Lebrun.
The royal court at Versailles was just 20 miles from the raging cauldron of Paris. Marie Antoinette too feared the Paris mob and counselled Louis to repair to the country so he could quell rebellion from afar, but Louis would not leave Versailles.
The Queen was successful in convincing Louis to increase troops from the provinces, which they hoped would be loyal to the crown. Marie’s actions did not go unnoticed. Her proud bearing and perceived arrogance made her the prime target for vilification by the revolutionaries. Despite Antoinette’s efforts, the king was reluctant to confront the assembly after new troops were called in, but Louis would not fire on his own people. In the summer period called the “Great Fear” peasants revolted through the countryside in fear that the king under pressure from the queen and her “Austrian committee” would put down revolution. In August, the Declaration of the Rights of Man was published renouncing noble titles, the people further asserting their position seeking equal rights against reassertion of absolute monarchy.
March of Women
On October 1 1789, a great banquet for the royal guards was held at Versailles, where royal and Austrian banners were cheered and toasts made to king and queen in attendance while the tricolour cockade of the French people was trod under foot. Tales of the banquet and “orgies” spread to the Paris slums where a new bread shortage was looming.
Parisians said enough is enough and on October 4, a great mob collected to demand bread from the king. The next day the mob mainly of Parisian women marched thought the driving rain to Versailles to put an end to orgies and demand bread. Many brandished knives and swore to use them to “cut the pretty throat of the Austrian” who was the source of all their problems. “How glad I’d be to put this blade into her belly up to my elbow.” Others vowed to cut different “pieces of Antoinette”.
On reaching Versailles, they met with the assembly and had a brief audience with the king. Again, the Queen had wished to flee at their advance, but Louis would neither depart nor fire on the women. That night the mob (perhaps aided by agents of the Duke of Orleans) found an unguarded entrance and was directed straight to the apartments of the sleeping queen. As they hurled their imprecations to “kill the Austrian whore”, the Queen’s two guards gave their lives to save her, as Madame Campan and her other maids hastily gathered some clothes and underwear, and Marie Antoinette ran from her bed literally “half naked” (by some accounts) to narrowly elude her attackers. They later ripped the Queen’s bed to pieces.
Installation at Tuileries
The Queen had escaped with her life, but the mob was not satisfied. They later demanded that king and queen appear on the balcony before them and then that the monarchs return with them to Paris. And so, Louis and Marie left Versailles to be installed in the dusty unused Tuileries palace in Paris. Marie Antoinette would never again see her beloved Petit Trianon. From then on, the king and queen would be under the close scrutiny of the common citizens of Paris and vulnerable to attack from them. For king and queen were acutely aware that the move to Paris was not of their choosing but they were powerless to overrule the dictate of the mob.
In 1790 and 1791, the revolution seemed to have stabilized. However, the seeds for future discord and for a more violent revolution were already being sown. The emboldened assembly gave broad rights to the people, at the expense of the nobles and clergy. Many of the reforms were voted into law over the king’s veto. Louis was particularly anxious over the civil oath now required of Roman Catholic clergy.
Flight to Varennes
Many nobles had fled France, and Marie Antoinette feared for her safety and royal authority. She conspired with these émigrés and sought aid from other European rulers including her brother, the Austrian Emperor. After the death of the leading moderate politician, Conte Mirabeau in 1791, and further actions of the Assembly infringing the authority of Roman Catholic clergy, Marie convinced the reluctant Louis to flee France.
The queen’s friend and rumoured lover Axel Fersen from his own pocket arranged the needed coach, assumed identity papers and escape plans. The royal couple with their children all disguised as common travellers, escaped from Paris. The king and queen had insisted that they travel with all needed comforts, so their coach was lumbering and slow. It required extra horses and changes and attracted attention.
At one change an alert patriot noticed an attractive but familiar woman who issued orders though dressed as a maid. He thought he recognized the queen and from a gold piece given as a tip recognized the king. This patriot Jacques Drouet sped ahead and reached the small town Varennes and alerted the people who confronted the king and queen on arrival. They had travelled over 200 miles and were just near the French-Austrian border and loyal troops ready to rescue them. But the rescue did not occur. A humiliated king and queen were forced to return to Paris over dusty roads over the course of the next four days. Frenchmen came from near and far to gaze and glare at the famous captives, on several occasions almost assaulting them. Later members of the assembly arrived and crowded into the coach with them.
When they arrived in Paris they met complete silence with all men keeping on their hats and no salutes or other sign of deference to the king. The weary travellers were caked in dust and sweat. As Campan drew the bath for Marie Antoinette, and Queen removed her hat and veil, both noticed the Queen’s blonde hair was now completely white from the fright and torment of the journey.
Downfall of Monarchy
After the disastrous flight to Varennes, Marie Antoinette at first worked with constitutional monarchist Barnave to try to restore royal prestige. However, hatred of the queen now rose to new levels.
Marie Antoinette began anew to seek aid from abroad to intervene in France and restore royal authority. Austria and Prussia threatened France on behalf of the royal family and France declared war on those powers in April 1792, again over the king’s veto. In June, the Tuileries palace was invaded and sacked by a mob, the king and queen held up to ridicule and humiliation but not otherwise harmed. At the same time, calls for volunteers arose under the cry “Patrie en Danger”, as Frenchmen were called to repel the invaders.
In July 1792, as Prussian armies invaded France, the Duke of Brunswick threatened the people of Paris that if any harm came to persons of the king or queen, serious vengeance would be exacted by the invaders on France. The proclamation was made public and caused a sensation in the country.
On August 10, 1792, the Tuileries palace was stormed by the populace, who sought refuge in the Assembly. The king and queen and their family were installed in the tiny reporter’s box, amid stifling heat, glares and heckling of the crowd. In that cage, they heard the reports of the fall of the Tuileries and massacre of the 900 Swiss guards who had stayed to defend them. They watched as treasures from the Tuileries were piled on the speaker’s desk including papers, jewels, precious objects of the royal family. They listened to the debates which voted to suspend and then end the monarchy. A Republic declared and the royal family imprisoned in the Temple fortress.
Reign of Terror
Other aristocrats were imprisoned at this same time. As the fortunes of French armies in the field waned the cry went up to kill traitors in their midst. Hundreds of aristocrats were massacred in the prisons in September 1792. The most famous victim was Madame Lamballe, close friend of Marie Antoinette who had returned to Paris to aid her in time of peril. Lamballe was summoned before a tribunal and when she failed to swear an oath against the queen, she was hacked to death by the mob, her head, breasts and genitals severed and mounted on pikes, and paraded before the Queen’s window in the Temple. The Reign of Terror had now begun.
The royal family was under close guard and now shorn of all their finery and servants and forced to live simply in the confines of the Temple fortress. But their peace was not to last.
In December 1792, King Louis XVI was summoned before the National Convention and tried for treason. He was convicted and on a close vote sentenced to death. In January 1793, Louis XVI was executed on the guillotine. In the two years that followed thousands more would be tried before revolutionary tribunals and similarly executed on the guillotine.
The Queen’s Fate
After her husband’s death, in July 1793, Marie Antoinette’s son was forcibly taken from her. The poor woman begged that her son be allowed to stay but she was powerless to change the will of the ministers. The boy was put under the care of Simon, a cobbler and one of the Commissaires of the Commune, and died of neglect within two years.
In September 1793, Marie Antoinette was separated from her daughter and sister in law. Now called “Widow Capet”, Marie was transferred to months of solitary confinement in the dank Conciergerie prison, where she was under twenty-four hour guard by revolutionaries who from behind their screen watched her every move. The Conciergerie prison was the antechamber to death. In this dank prison, she lost much weight and her eyesight began to fail, but she did not have long to live.
On October 14, the poor pallid woman was awoken at night and faced the Revolutionary Tribunal. The trial was a horror, with the Queen attacked more as a person than as a queen. Her own son was forced to testify that she abused him. The queen bravely replied to all charges and to this she said, “If I make no reply, it is because I cannot, I appeal to all mothers in this audience.”
Despite her eloquence, the verdict was never in doubt. Like the king, Marie was found guilty.
When she rode to her death on October 16, 1793, many gasped … for Marie Antoinette was just 38, but the crowd saw (as artist David sketched) an old hag in peasant garb, ragged and grey – a stark contrast to elegant and voluptuous Queen of Trianon, the child of fortune, she had been just 4 years earlier. Marie Antoinette’s hair had been roughly shorn, her with hands tied tight behind her back, as she rode in the garbage cart amid the crowd’s whistles and jeers. Yet, the poor woman sat straight and tried to retain her dignity. To the end, Marie Antoinette displayed a queen’s bearing and courage, in the face of all adversity.
After her final ordeal, the body of Marie Antoinette was harshly pushed on to the guillotine plank, her head placed in the vice and at noon the blade fell to loud cheers all round. In the words of a revolutionary organ, “Never has Piere Duchesne seen such joy as seeing that [expletive] whore’s head separated from her [expletive] crain’s neck”. Sanson held her bleeding head high for all to see. Later her head was throne in the cart between her legs. The body of Marie Antoinette was left on the grass before being dumped in an unmarked grave. So ended the life of once the most illustrious and glamorous woman in all Europe.
Bonnie
this talk of her saying “Let them eat cake,” if she even said it, is probably contributed to what her advisors in court were telling her. She had no idea in the begining of her peoples poorness. Alls she knew was what her advisors told her, and she was young, so she believed them until she saw with her own eyes what was going on. Then she tried to help, she did charity and helped as much as possible. That is just not said because people like to ridicule her about personal life, which we hardly know the true facts of, and her fashions. What is wrong with buying grand. She was queen, she had a rep. to uphole and she just so happens to be the most stylish figurehead in history and today in fashion is looked back on as begining of Fashion. Her style is still influencing designers today. The debt was not caused by her, but by Louis the IV- The Sun King who built the huge palace of Versailles. It has 1,400 fountains, a hall of mirrors, all gold, and huge real crystal chandeliers. Hell yeah thats expensive! With thousands of acres of gardens. Do you even have any idea how much water pressure was needed to run these fountains! Today, to build this, you would need around 10 million dollars! That’s where the debt came from. Try paying that one off!
Emma
Waw what a tragedy, It does pain my heart yet make me want to learn more.
[Edited for relevance … Please see earlier note regarding discussion of religion. Thank you.]
Glad I stumbled on this, food for thought in many ways.
sara
Imagine yourself at the age she was, and everything you have ever known taken from you. Then to be thrown into a life where you know absolutly no one, but are forced to where a smile and act as if you like it. Of course , she needed escape from it sometimes and who would nt at that age and lifestyle, want all the pretty expensive things. but even through all the horrors of her own children dying and some being ripped from her arms, only to b neglected and meeting death as well. She held her head high right to the very end. She was truly a QUEEN, and we should all hope that we have the courage and dignity to live our lives that way, and even die that way. May you rest in peace now MRS.ANTOINETTE, for all you went through. My thoughts and prayers will always be with you and your children.
lemercier duquesnay
Once again, take your screenplay to Hollywood. My Queen was not whom you concocted.
Madeline Young
I would like to say that this is a very well written and accurate account of the Dauphine’s life. One thing that I did find troubling was the miss-quotaion of her phrase “Let them eat cake.” This saying is generally lost in translation. When told of the people’s sufferings the naivee Antoinette answered with “Qu’ils mangent de la brioche”. Brioche is a bread that is enriched with eggs and butter, a sort of dessert bread, not cake. Although Marie had the best intentions for her people, she failed to grasp the concept of the LACK of food the French people were facing. I find this to be key in understanding her character, for she was not as selfish as some portray, just oblivious.
Merci beaucoup.
Madeline Young
Another thing I am noticing with the comments is sympathy or plain disregard. Marie Antoinette was a women married off in a marraige arraingement for political alliances. What most tend to forget is that the age that people were married at was younger, not to mention most Americans will not understand this due to the fact that we are not emiresed daily in that culture. I personally have been to France, seen her bed, her secret passage ways, the Hall of Mirrors, everything. It is maginficent! And yes, that is where most of the debt came from. Louis XIV started to plan it out and build it, but it cost him greatly. Then came the war and alliance with American against Britain. This cost MONEY to send troops and supplies (guns, poweder, bullets…) across the ocean. Marie contributed with her extravigent fashion and frivilous spending, but at this time the French were just looking for a scapegoat, an excuse for change, and she handed it to them. She was very sought after by many men, and the ones she turned down plotted against her. Women gossiped about her because of their jealousness of her beauty and position. Who wouldn’t want to be Queen of France? True she was young and naivee but she was also strong and pushed for many of the political changes, even if those changes didn’t favor the citizens of France all the time. She was royalty and they were commoners.
The French have been oppressed for centuries. First by the churches who limited their freedoms and took bribes from noblity. Then monarchy comes with strict rules with their noses up, holding to things lovely and sparkling and despising what is dirty and below them (ie. peasants). French people are full of passion. They hold tight to their freedoms and rights. There is so much more to them as a people that Americans will never grasp. I have only skimmed the surface with my studies and frequent encounters with French people. I have spoken French since I was young, but I am still learning. To understand the whole dynamic of the country at the time, I believe you would really have to go to France, speak to an elder living there, and go to the libraries and Versaille.
Keep researching. Keep learning. Keep up the curiosity. Most importantly, keep an open mind. Don’t jump to conclusions until u have all points of view and facts and are able to disceern for yourself what you believe.
Vive France! Liberté, Equalité, Fraternité!
Jordan
What is the authors name of this article? And how do I cite this source?
wilbe
Marie Antoinette looked extravagant but actually when the financial crisis in France occurred she was one of the first to cut down on spending and she even cut down on the palace officials. The other nobles where jealous of her so they spread the rumors that she was very extravagant. She’s my hero!
Pugwash81
Louis didn’t have an operation. Court documents say he never took a break from horse riding. His own doctor said that he was “Well made” and Marie Antoinette’s brother spoke with him and told in WRITTING, that they were “Blunderes”. People forget the fact he hated austria and was brought up not to trust them. Well not likely going to go easily to bed with one are you?. It is also noted that they started trying 4 years before the official consumation. Basicaly neither knew how to do it. He wouldn’t ejaculate inside her. I hate having to defend Louis in this matter all the time. Specially as most historians and biographers know about the documents, but choose to slander him (even if they think they are doing him justice) in that way. Louis wasn’t interested in sex and feared it at the same time. Maybe one day we can focus on how he built the first fire stations and marshals, or how he stayed true to god till the end.
Pugwash81
@Madeline Young, Sorry I would find it impossible to enjoy liberty and freedom knowing it came, not from brave soldiers who fought for thier country, but blood thirsty crimminals who murdered anyone and everyone. Bastille day is a celebration of rape, murder, injustice and corruption. Oh…. and false liberty. What about Louis XVI liberty? or Marie or thier children. Or when nobility women were litterally torn apart alive in the streets, some haveing thier breasts cut off, while they are screaming for mercy. Where was the right of man when thier trials/executions was being corrupted? Easy things for the French people of today to ignore for the sake of liberty.
Madeline Young
I agree that there was injustices during that time that there was no excuse for. But the whole psychological termoil in the country at that time greatly contributed to the actions of the people. Desperate times calls for desperate measures as they say. By no means does this excuse their actions, but I think it helps us to better understand them. French people today are not proud of their history. Actually when you come to think of it, not many countries are. Humanity is like a tragedy, except the play doesn’t stop and the actors cannot go home. I only want people to view both sides to the equation and try to see where other points of view are coming from, to try to understand them. C’est tout.
Kenley Walters
Marie Antoinette is the muse to my paper for a model french royal and she is truly amazing. As Dawn said, I wonder if she ever had any true hapiness. It is a sad ending to a very misunderstood life, that even I myself will never fully and completely understand. For I am only twelve years old and I still ponder the thought. I have found myself truly and completely fascinated by this woman. She was a truly remarkable person and I still ponder as to why those atrocious people would behead this amazing person, for she changed many lives, including mine, even several centuries later. I am currently reading a book about her called the Royal Diaries, Topic: Marie Antoinette, Princess of Versailles. She has impacted many lives all the way up to today and i’m sure will impact many more. Thus, completing my statement, this woman was truly remarkable and had a terrible death, for many of you know that she died of a beheading. Sad. Terribly sad. 🙁
bethie.x
Just in the wrong place at the wrong time. Poor, poor woman. <3
B.M
For years I have been in awww of Maire. Her story is one that I can’t even being to understand how she lived her life day to day. So young and innocent and having to grow up so fast beyond her years. I’m planing a trip to France this March. I’ve made it a point to stop by Versailles and walk in her footsteps.
jenna newberg
i love this site it has the best info EVER!!!!!!
Hersey Namie
I am writing a research paper about Marie Antoinette and this helped so much! Thank you!
Bree
reading this biography, i now know things my teachers or my research had not explained, ever since i found about marie antionette apart of me has been inspired, i just cant believe how inhumaine they were in the french revolutoin, hence the guilotine……..i will be reading this site again, as i enjoyed it so much……and for the record, i believe she did not say “let them eat cake”
Shame on the French
Shame on those who carried through with the French Revolution. The acts they exhibited were the most perverse and disgusting actions which were far worse than anything they ever accused her of. How dare they plumage and murder with fictional juries at the same time admonishing Queen Antionette for adolescent actions. Disgusting French people. Shameful revolution. They were all cold-blooded killers. Murderers to the end.
Antoinette
my name is antoinette.
Shannon
@Shame on the French. It is true that everything that had gone on in the French Revolution was 100% cruel and unjust, but not all the French people at the time agreed with what was going on. There were many people against it at the time, and many people who believed in the years after the Bastille came down that things had gone much too far. The only thing keeping it from being stopped was that the people who wanted it to keep going were the people in most power. Even though at one time those people were just bourgeoisies who didn’t have much say, they convinced everyone and gained power. So, it wasn’t good to blame everyone. Just the ones who thought they were doing France good in these acts.
Caitlin
well i was watching a movie about marie antoinette and i learned alot about after i watched the movie i goggled her and i didnt even know today was the annv of her death so she was very beautiful woman she had alot of cute clothes n jewelry she had a good since of fashion and. THEY TOOK HER CHILDREN FROM HER N STRAVED HER SHE LOST HER EYE SIGHT N CHOPPED HER HEAD OFF FOR THE PEOPLE TO SEE I FEEL THATS NOT JUST RIGHT AT ALL THEY JUS DID HER VERY WRONG I LOVE THIS WEBSITE IT GIVES THE BEST INFO EVER I LOVE IT I JUS WANTED TO LEARN MORE ABOUT MARIE ANTOINETTE I HAVE JUS BEEN INPISERED I JUST DONT UNDERSTAND WHY THE FRENCH REV WOULD TREAT HER SO CRUEL AND MEAN NOT RIGHT AND TORE HER ROOM UP AND EVERYTHING IMPRISONED HER,HUSBAND ,HER LOVELY CHILDREN
alexa
Wow this was sad. She seemeded like a great person. I agree with who ever said each story has two sides, but i think it was horrible the way they treated her. She did try to help the poor. She was very misunderstood and deserved a chance to clear her name. What the they did to her was harsh (and ick!) whatever they had against her, there was no need to go that far.
alexa
hope history won’t repeat it self!
Anwen
I dreamt about Marie-Antoinette 2 nights ago… hence why i have researched her story. My ex husband told me once that i used to speak fluent french in my sleep – however have never learnt french. In my dream she was a busty blonde wearing a bright red flambouyant outfit, fitted bustiere, frilly white blouse underneath, almost the same as this picture on this website. My dream is bugging and i have no explanations to my dream. I wept for her not knowing anything about her. After reading her story i am saddened and feel sick to the core. What an horrific life, filled with pain, jealousy, betrayal, torture on every level, and grief. May she rest in peace.
michelle
I have loved to learn about Marie Antoinette for a long time and this website has helped so much.I wish I could have met and gotten to know her. I would like to know how to cite this page though?
joanne
I am so interested in marie antoinette and other women of royalty of
early history. I would love to read more on her and see pictures of
her.
Aimee
I think it is possible that Louis XVI may have been on the Autistic spectrum, and perhaps had Aspergers syndrome, due to his lack of desire to be touched and fascination with things such as locks and keys. It could also explain why he was little of a public speaker in times of crisis, such as the revolution and downfall of the monarchy.
nikke
i believe that she was a high lady that any one could look up to and be proud. if she was my mother i would be the proudest person in the world
sam
I have to do a project on her…i have to do an “interview” and I am going to dress up like her and everything.
Olav O
My first trip to Versailles I was 15- and it got to me! Had read a book about her life prior to my visit..I really “met” her, and felt sooo strange the whole day..Going again soon with a friend,also interested in these stories and people. I like Coppolas film, obviously it’s not a historical document- but she managage to build up the psycological aspect greatly, and gives it a NERVE that I never seen before…and costumes/actors are great too- a bald brave take from S.Coppola- TA! By the way: I think I WAS M.A, and my husband was …..”Ms.America” herself………;-)Adieu
Allison
When was this last updated?
Erin
i absolutely ADORE Marie Antoinette and French Culture in general….. i currently am doung a report for my french classs on her, and this was very helpfull……. gotta <3 Marie!! 🙂
Mariano
Whether monarchy or democracy, a government, if led by people like Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette,will always end up in a revolution and reign of terror!The French, notwithstanding their pretensions to civilization, are still as barbaric as the ancient Gauls when provoked by extreme poverty, hunger and downright indignation!
Kate
The last paragraph says “Later her head was throne in the cart” it should be “her head was thrown”.
Other than that this site is wonderful and very informative
Victoria Hopkins
Strangely, I googled the bio of Marie Antoinette today and just gasped when I found out that she died on this same day. I don’t know what compelled me to think of her today.How spooky is that?
Nat
Wow………her life was ended tragically but I am so inspired and will read this story all the time!!!!!!!!
Margaret
I am 62 yrs old, Australian, and was very strictly educated. I watched Marie Antionette with Kirsten Dunst and enjoyed it even though it was far from factual.
My main complaint is that at least 80% of people who decided to comment on the life of M.A are close to being illiterate. The combination of bad spelling, bad punctuation, bad grammar and pathetic comments on something they have no clue about is distressing , to say the least. Does anyone in America know how to spell?
Lorraine
I think she was caught in the web of her time and had a tragic life. I feel for her.
Judy Laaper
I wish they had just sent her back to Austria with her children, If her mother “Empress Maria Teresa” was still alive she would have saved her and her children.
Hope
this site really helped me figure out how to say she caused a revoultion, a reform, and caused a major reaction,
desiray
she has the same middle name as me my real mom says we were related
eliza
i’d just like to say, im not sure about this one, but the article on the diamond necklass affair was historically incorrect, and people have been saying they dont care cos it was “a good read” id just like to point out, marie antoinette was a REAL PERSON!!!!! not a story so saying reading lies is a good read is like reading a tabloid to find out the news. the only good this website has done is prove how many supporters marie antoinette had, other than that all it does is anger poeple like me who actually know stuff about marie antoinette by reading books written by REAL historians who do acurate research and make sure they are printing the truth!!!!!!! i’m thirteen, most of the poeple on this website are adults, so how is it that i care more about the truth than they do?
Clare
Eliza, which parts of the article are historically incorrect? Which books have you read? If you’d like to challenge the accounts given here then by all means do so but please be clearer about what it is that you are actually challenging.
Amy Tinlin
That was a real tragical end of a life. I would rather say they could sent children with her. anyway I am little bit doubtful about that Diamond Necklace Affair, it seems controversial. But she was a role model of French revolution by which she gathered lots of supporters.
eliza
ok, in the article about the diamond neckless affair, it started off by saying she was married at fifteen, she was fourteen. you spelt habsburg like hapsburg. louis XVI never had the opperation that the article claimed he had.and it was not even that he couldnt….do stuff, it was just that he didnt know how. marie antoinette’s mother was called maria teresa, marie therese was her daughter.also in this article it was correct in saying she was married at fourteen, but you should at least make it so that in everything on this website the facts are the same!
you should read marie antoinette:the last queen of france, by evelynne lever, its by an author who actually does research before she writes things!
also, i think you shouldnt have a website about marie antoinette unless you actually have your facts right.
Clare
Thanks for a clearer explanation Eliza. This is all contested history, Evelyne Lever’s biography is just one account. You will find differing accounts in differing histories. I think you would find that the authors of the articles on this site have done their research, they simply come to different conclusions to yours. If Lever is the only author you have read, then I in turn encourage you to read more widely.
Shannon
Wow. I have learned more about Antoinette from this website than I did last year in my tenth grade history class. And what a coincidence that I decided to research her in depth on the anniversary of her (unfortunate) beheading. My thanks goes to the editor and the many commentators who have expanded on these articles. I hope the French masses will someday come to know their queen better.
eliza
ok, firsy of all, i have read more than one book on marie antoinette, also how can you blame things like getting names mixed up and miss spellings on “differing explanations”? also, the other thing that i mentioned was incorrect i have heard form at least five different acounts by real hisotrians. and the thing i wrote about louis XVI never having that opperation, he kept hunting diaries, so had he had that opperation, wouldnt he have been hunting every day or whatever, i mean if you were a guy and you had an operation on your penis would you be hunting, which involves riding a horse, within a day or so? and this being the eighteenth century, no painrelief, i didnt think so.
also, i’m not claiming to know loads about marie antoinette, but i do know enough to know this website’s in correct, and i think today of all days is not the time to argue about it seeing as at quarter past twelve today it was the exact 217 year anniversary of her death, but i think people, if they are interested in marie antoinette, owe her the respect to put the truth, and there is loads of evidence to support what i’m saying. i mean loads of people who lived at versailles between 1770 and 1789 wrote diarys as well as the king himself, so no offence, but i think that i’m am write. im not that great a person, im crap at most things, but the one thing i know is history. and i know its hard to admit somethings wrong but isnt it better to do that than claim your write when your not. and marie antoinette was a person, like i am and i think your a person (im not quite sure, i dont mean that in a mean way, im just saying….) and she was wrong and naive most of the time and she screwed up to many times to count, but her whole life was spent with people assumeing they knew everything about her, when they didnt. i know i dont know everything aobut her, how could i? she’s been dead 217 years, but at least if i was wrong, i would admit it.
Clare
Thanks for coming back Eliza, I think that we can discuss her life on the anniversary of her death so many years after the fateful day is evidence of the intrigue that Marie Antoinette holds for so many people.
As I said earlier there are many versions of Marie-Antoinette’s history, as none of us were there we have no claims on knowing which version is the truth. Certainly there may be some small errors in the text, the author is not available to correct them (I am not the uthor and I will not put words in his mouth). I think you will find however that the bulk of the history here, including some of the aspects that you disagree with is supported by historical scholarship. Is one version correct and the other false, perhaps, but that is what the comments section and the forum are here for. I don’t think it’s at all useful however to say “I think this history is wrong and it should be taken off the Internet.” If that were the standard we were going to live by there would be a lot less interesting material to read online and nothing to talk about.
Can I invite you to join the forum here? I think you will find lots of people who share your view and others who might enjoy the debate with you!
eliza
first of all, i’m not trying to be stubborn, but one of the things i said was incorrect and had historical evidence from the person it was about. ok, i keep a diary, like louis XVI did, if in 217 years somoebody said i had an opperation, but it was not mentioned in my diary which historians new very well existed, wouldnt that mean people were either ignoring the one which was more likely to be the truth, or choosing to believe historians over somebody who would know if they had an opperation, and if so, why would it not be mentioned in the diary. i mean an opperation is a pretty big thing.
also, i think it is better to have less historical stuff on the internet in general, i mean, no wonder librarys are closing down, if people read the first website they see who knows how correct it was, i mean, say there was a website about marie antoinette which said she was evil, killed her husband and was a whore, as well as being a mistress to both her brothers in law, which is obviously not true and as far as i know this website doesnt exist, but say it did, what if it was created by a descendent of robespierre, who was looking to increase M.A.’s bad name, whereas with book, people are less likely to do that if they’ve got to find enough lies for a three hundred page book. also, the internet is very unreliable, ive seen three different websites about marie antoinette, its mysterious how the number of her siblings increases each website.
and sometimes the internet is the only way to find stuff out, i’m writing a historical novel set in restoration london, and the main character is an actress, it was the first time they had actresses in england, and i cant find a single book about restoration actresses, so im putting my faith in the internet, but i want to be as historically correct as possible, so i either have to find a time machine (unlikely) stop writing it(the characters are always in my head so not possible) or believe what i read on the internet, which i am very reluctent to do. so sometimes the internet is the only way, but i think if someone is interested in marie antoinette they should read at least two different books by different authors. because with marie antoinette at least there are a lot of books about her
i dont mean to insult this website cos i appreciate that alot of history is bound to be incorrect, i mean as well as the fact most historians have a biased oppinion so yeah, but i just want the world to know as much of the truth as possible, especially when it comes to marie antoinette, cos their were so many lies told about her when she was still alive, and now when she’s dead some people still believe them, or believe particular historical movies about her which portray her as an idiot.