Marie Antoinette – A Biography
- At July 01, 2009
- By Clare
- In Articles, Biography
219

Marie Antoinette was the beautiful Queen of France who became a symbol for the wanton extravagance of the 18th century monarchy, and was stripped of her riches and finery, imprisoned and beheaded by her own subjects during the French Revolution that began in 1789.
As her life began there was little hint of this total reversal of life’s fortunes. Marie Antoinette was born in 1755 at very apex of the European social pyramid.
She was born a princess and archduchess, the 15th daughter of Maria Teresa, Empress of Austria. The Hapsburg house of Austria was the oldest royal house of Europe, and the young princess enjoyed the relaxed environment of the Schonbrünn Palace and the indulgence of tutors her parents, brothers and sisters.
Marie Thérèse was famous Austrian empress who counted among her many accomplishments her ability to marry her many children in ways strategic to the Austrian empire. So it was with Marie Antoinette. For this daughter, Marie Thérèse arranged a special marriage to cement the new alliance with France that she had concluded with Louis XV. So, Marie Antoinette was to leave Austria to the most prestigious throne in all Europe.
French Queen
The life of Marie Antoinette was the stuff of dreams when she was married at age 14 to the crown prince of France, the dauphin. France was then the most powerful nation of continental Europe, and the royal palace at Versailles the most opulent. The young princess could hardly have hoped for a more prestigious marriage and her magnificent marriage ceremony in 1770 was unmatched in royal pageantry.
At the border she was stripped and re-dressed with clothing fashionable at the French court. When she was presented to the French king Louis XV, he pronounced her delightful, and told others of her fine full figure, of which he much approved. She became dauphine surrounded by all the comforts of the French court.
Her enchanted life reached its pinnacle when the old king died and her husband became King Louis XVI in 1774. Marie Antoinette, still a teenager became Queen of France.
Unhappy Marriage and Boredom
But this daughter of life’s fortune was unhappy in her marriage. Louis was homely, awkward and hardly her heart’s desire. His devotion to the hunt, clocks and his workshop and his early hours were in contrast to her pursuit of the arts, fashion, dance and French nightlife. The contrast of Charles and Diana comes to mind. While King Louis XV, her husband’s brothers, Provence and Artois, and others at court noticed at once her grace and beauty, her own shy husband was slow to exercise the rights of the marriage bed. From afar, Louis XVI, like the others, much admired Marie’s physical charms and her character, and Louis would become a thoroughly devoted husband, but in her early years in France he was little comfort to her.
Pushed by her mother’s letters, Marie still sought out Louis. Yet, to add to Antoinette’s frustration, even when she could achieve intimacy with him, Louis was unable to achieve erection. So, Antoinette and Louis were unable to have sex and their marriage went unconsummated for seven years. It took the intervention of the Queen’s oldest brother, emperor Joseph of Austria, in a heart to heart meeting with Louis in 1777, to convince him to have the needed operation. Meanwhile, the teenage queen suffered in silence as she was snidely taunted for her inability to produce an heir to the throne.
Beyond her personal frustrations with her husband, Marie Antoinette was bored with her position and its duties. The days of the young princess and then queen were spent in endless court rituals and strict etiquette tracing to the days of Louis XIV.
The young queen tired of being constantly on public display with the requirements of her position. She missed the more relaxed environment and freedom of Vienna. Her displeasure and sarcasm directed at the older aunts and members of the high nobility were noticed and commented upon.
Circle of Friends
Marie Antoinette sought escape from her marital frustration and the boredom of court life. Time went by and she began to exercise power as queen, Marie Antoinette spent less time at court, and surrounded herself with a dissolute clique, led by Yolande de Polignac and Thérèse de Lamballe. She lavished expensive gifts and positions upon these friends and in doing so ignored the great houses of the French nobility.
With her young friends, Marie Antoinette threw herself into a life of pleasure and careless extravagance. These included masked balls in Paris, gambling, theatricals and late night promenades in the park. Her circle included the King’s frivolous young brother the Count of Artois, and handsome young courtiers the Duc de Ligne, Counts Dillon, Vaudreuil and Axel Fersen.
The Queen’s indiscretions with her circle of friends led to scandals such as the Diamond Necklace Affair and rumours concerning her relations with that circle including Axel Fersen.
Extravagant Life
The young queen, with her blonde beauty and style set fashion trends through France and Europe. Her painter Vigee Lebrun commented about the translucent colour of her complexion, her long blonde hair and her well-proportioned and full-bosomed figure. All commented how well she carried herself. Her page Tilly said she walked better than any woman and as you’d offer a woman a chair, you’d offer her a throne.
The queen enjoyed her beauty style, but her fashion fame came at a price. The Queen spent lavishly on her dress and adornments. Each year she exceeded her clothing allowance which the King covered. The excessive fashions for high headdresses, plumes and voluminous dresses were subject to public comment, caricature and on occasion ridicule.
The queen also spent lavishly on her friends as mentioned and on her entertainment including her retreat at Petit Trianon. This small palace adjoining Versailles was given to Marie by Louis XVI. There she arranged extensive interior decorations and building of a theatre for her theatricals and the Temple of Love in the park.
Marie also had built a rustic Viennese retreat called the hameau. Here, she played at being at being a simple milkmaid. To add to the fun, Sevres porcelain bowls were cast using Marie Antoinette’s own ample breasts as their mould (as was said to have had been done in the case of Helen of Troy). The hameau was stocked with perfumed sheep and goats, but the actual milking and chores were done by servants.
Anger at the Queen
By the late 1780s, envy and hatred of Marie Antoinette were widespread. Many at court had always opposed the Austrian alliance, and had resented her efforts to intercede on occasion for Austrian causes.
The king’s brother the Count of Provence and his cousin the Count of Orleans both thought they were more capable than Louis XVI. They were jealous both of Louis’s kingship and his marriage to the beautiful Marie Antoinette.
Many others among the nobility were envious of the Queen and insulted by her dismissal of court etiquette, preference for her small court circle and the patronage she wielded on their behalf. Thus, disaffected members of the nobility became fertile sources for dirt on the queen. They fabricated and circulated scurrilous stories about the Queen and her private life. Stories accused of all sort of sexual acts with men and women of the court, of sending funds to Austria, and challenged the paternity of the royal children.
Diamond Necklace Affair
By the mid 1780s tales of the queen’s extravagance, dissipation and sexual vice abounded. It was at this point that the Diamond Necklace Affair became the sensation, grabbing the attention of the entire nation.
The affair fused three disparate situation, united by widely held beliefs in the loose morals of Marie Antoinette. For years an impoverished scion of past Valois nobility, Madame Lamotte schemed to gain a position at court. At the same time, socially prominent Prince de Rohan, the Cardinal of France was unhappy over his years of exclusion from Marie Antoinette’s inner circle, and the jeweller Boehmer was unable to convince Marie Antoinette to buy a fabulously expensive diamond necklace originally made for Louis XV’s lover Madame du Barry.
Lamotte was a full-figured attractive woman who caught the attention of both men, and was able to convince them she was a lesbian lover of Marie Antoinette. Lamotte convinced Rohan that the Queen indeed wanted the necklace and Rohan obtained it from Boehmer and gave it to Lamotte after meeting a prostitute dressed as Marie Antoinette at a late night rendezvous near the Temple of Love, where the Queen was said to hold lovers’ trysts with others.
When Boehmer approached the Queen for payment (just as she was preparing for to play a role in a banned Beaumarchais play Le Figaro), the charade unravelled. When they learned the basic facts of the affair, both king and queen were enraged that Rohan would think that the queen would use a go-between to obtain a necklace.
Necklace Trial and Impact
Royal pique proved disastrous. The cardinal, highest churchman in France, was arrested on the Day of Assumption in the middle of the entire court. Next the Queen demanded public vindication, so the king obtained a trial before the Parlement of Paris.
The trial proved a sensation for months, with the dirty laundry of the monarchy paraded before all France. The cast included the highest nobles, charlatans, a prostitute who looked like the Queen, and above all the fabulous diamond necklace and the Queen herself despite never being called as witness. In the end, the nobility displayed their defiance before the entire nation in the Diamond Necklace Affair with their acquittal of Prince de Rohan on the charge of insulting the queen. The ruling of the Parlement of Nobles effectively said that at the least, given her reputation, the queen was worthy of such insult. Rohan could reasonably believe Marie Antoinette would use him as a go-between and in the end exchange her sexual favours for a diamond necklace.
When the not guilty verdict was announced in the crowded Paris opera house an enormous roar went up and all eyes turned to the royal box. A shocked Marie Antoinette hastily departed for her coach, amid the crowd’s hoots.
The court did convict the less well-connected Lamotte, and she was branded on her breasts and imprisoned. But her husband had escaped to England and she escaped prison. She exacted her revenge by concocting and circulating a tale that she was indeed the queen’s lesbian lover, that the queen was insatiable in her desires and that the queen got the necklace and the affair was all for her amusement. As fabulous as her story was, it circulated in the thousands and was widely believed. So much so that had she not died in 1793, Lamotte might well have testified against Marie at her trial.
Madame Deficit and Financial Crisis
Ironically, as the Diamond Necklace Affair erupted and the Queen’s popularity sank to its nadir, age and maturity tempered her lifestyle. Louis and Marie were able to have children and Antoinette bore four children. She spent less time with Paris night life and more with her children and family. Though still graceful and attractive, as she passed age thirty, Marie’s increasingly stout figure moved her toward darker colours. Her milliner Madame Bertin used less ostentatious fashion, while still showing Marie’s large bust to fine advantage. Even as she still flirted with men of court and spent much time with Axel Fersen, Louis was increasingly devoted to his handsome wife whom he adored.
While Marie’s personal life was settling down, the state of France was not. France also had bad harvests in the late 1780s and the poor suffered. The Queen was good-hearted and kindly and tried to aid the poor of her country. She attended benefits for charity (including the night the Necklace verdict was announced), and used the hameau to aid a number of impoverished families. However, her small acts were hardly noticed amid the suffering. What was remembered was that the queen played at being a milkmaid and shepherdess, at the manicured hameau of Trianon, while real peasants starved. Her perceived insensitivity led many to believe she said “Let them eat cake”, when told of the widespread starvation.
Furthermore, France reeled under huge debts inherited from Louis XV which Louis XVI had been unable to repay. France’s debt was now a crisis, with the final straw being its France’s costly aid from 1778 to 1783 to the American colonies in their War of Independence with Great Britain. To try to revive the Queen’s popularity and rally support for the monarchy portraits were made and exhibited showing the Queen surrounded by her loving children. Yet the obvious royal propaganda backfired as detractors noticing the Queen’s expansive costume, dubbed the pictured heroine, “Madame Deficit”.
It was at this time, amid such increased unpopularity and still reeling from the aftershocks of the Necklace Affair, when Louis XVI most needed support from the nobility. He tried to effect needed reforms through a series of ministers, relying in each instance on advice from his Queen, and then he called an assembly of notables to again try to effect reforms to deal with the financial crisis. Louis was not a forceful king, his wife’s influence was resented and the position of the monarchy weakened.
Estates General – 1789
Tragedy struck Louis and Marie in 1789. Their oldest son and heir, the dauphin, was dying of a crippling, agonizing hereditary disease and would die in June. Besides her miscarriages, this was the second child dead; their second daughter had died in 1786. And now amid this grief, the couple faced the crisis that now threatened their rule, which would bring still further tragedies to this family.
Unable to force the nobility to make needed financial reforms, the desperate king called the Estates General in May 1789. This was the first time in 175 years it was called. But it was unique because it gave representation to common men, as one of the three estates able to vote. Louis did this to try to gain the support of the common people (third estate) to force needed reforms.
The Estate General did not begin auspiciously as the Queen’s appearance was met first by silence and then call Vive Duc Orleans – her scorned suitor and hated foe. This rebelliousness was a sign of what was to follow. The common people were not content with the limited role of the third estate Louis envisioned. The genie was now out of the bottle. The third estate declared itself the national assembly and in the Tennis Court Oath said it would not adjourn until France had a constitution.
Fall of the Bastille
Louis lacked the will to quell this rebellion but was repeatedly lobbied to take action by Marie Antoinette. The queen strongly desired to preserve absolute monarchy and was firm in her opposition to reforms that would give greater power to the common people.
However, with a taste of success, the common people did not want to see the third estate suppressed. In July, a mob of commoners seized the Invalides and obtained a supply of fire arms. The next effort was to obtain powder so they could defend the assembly as needed. For this effort the mob attacked a great symbol of absolute monarchy, the ancient and famous Bastille prison and fortress that loomed in the centre of Paris.
Louis failed to take prompt action and the mob succeeded in taking the Bastille. The governor of the Bastille who resisted and threatened to blow up the gun powder was hacked to death by the mob his head sported on pikes for all to see. The crowd had arms and ammunition. Lawlessness had occurred and no royal action had been taken in response. Louis went to Paris to restore calm but no actions were taken against those who stormed the Bastille.
The Great Fear
The storming of the Bastille greatly disturbed a number of nobles who knew the poverty of the common people and feared vengeance if royal power was inadequate to check mob impulses. Leading members of the royal court, including close friends of Marie Antoinette fled the country. These included in July and August the Count of Artois and Madame Polignac and in October her close friend and portraitist Vigee Lebrun.
The royal court at Versailles was just 20 miles from the raging cauldron of Paris. Marie Antoinette too feared the Paris mob and counselled Louis to repair to the country so he could quell rebellion from afar, but Louis would not leave Versailles.
The Queen was successful in convincing Louis to increase troops from the provinces, which they hoped would be loyal to the crown. Marie’s actions did not go unnoticed. Her proud bearing and perceived arrogance made her the prime target for vilification by the revolutionaries. Despite Antoinette’s efforts, the king was reluctant to confront the assembly after new troops were called in, but Louis would not fire on his own people. In the summer period called the “Great Fear” peasants revolted through the countryside in fear that the king under pressure from the queen and her “Austrian committee” would put down revolution. In August, the Declaration of the Rights of Man was published renouncing noble titles, the people further asserting their position seeking equal rights against reassertion of absolute monarchy.
March of Women
On October 1 1789, a great banquet for the royal guards was held at Versailles, where royal and Austrian banners were cheered and toasts made to king and queen in attendance while the tricolour cockade of the French people was trod under foot. Tales of the banquet and “orgies” spread to the Paris slums where a new bread shortage was looming.
Parisians said enough is enough and on October 4, a great mob collected to demand bread from the king. The next day the mob mainly of Parisian women marched thought the driving rain to Versailles to put an end to orgies and demand bread. Many brandished knives and swore to use them to “cut the pretty throat of the Austrian” who was the source of all their problems. “How glad I’d be to put this blade into her belly up to my elbow.” Others vowed to cut different “pieces of Antoinette”.
On reaching Versailles, they met with the assembly and had a brief audience with the king. Again, the Queen had wished to flee at their advance, but Louis would neither depart nor fire on the women. That night the mob (perhaps aided by agents of the Duke of Orleans) found an unguarded entrance and was directed straight to the apartments of the sleeping queen. As they hurled their imprecations to “kill the Austrian whore”, the Queen’s two guards gave their lives to save her, as Madame Campan and her other maids hastily gathered some clothes and underwear, and Marie Antoinette ran from her bed literally “half naked” (by some accounts) to narrowly elude her attackers. They later ripped the Queen’s bed to pieces.
Installation at Tuileries
The Queen had escaped with her life, but the mob was not satisfied. They later demanded that king and queen appear on the balcony before them and then that the monarchs return with them to Paris. And so, Louis and Marie left Versailles to be installed in the dusty unused Tuileries palace in Paris. Marie Antoinette would never again see her beloved Petit Trianon. From then on, the king and queen would be under the close scrutiny of the common citizens of Paris and vulnerable to attack from them. For king and queen were acutely aware that the move to Paris was not of their choosing but they were powerless to overrule the dictate of the mob.
In 1790 and 1791, the revolution seemed to have stabilized. However, the seeds for future discord and for a more violent revolution were already being sown. The emboldened assembly gave broad rights to the people, at the expense of the nobles and clergy. Many of the reforms were voted into law over the king’s veto. Louis was particularly anxious over the civil oath now required of Roman Catholic clergy.
Flight to Varennes
Many nobles had fled France, and Marie Antoinette feared for her safety and royal authority. She conspired with these émigrés and sought aid from other European rulers including her brother, the Austrian Emperor. After the death of the leading moderate politician, Conte Mirabeau in 1791, and further actions of the Assembly infringing the authority of Roman Catholic clergy, Marie convinced the reluctant Louis to flee France.
The queen’s friend and rumoured lover Axel Fersen from his own pocket arranged the needed coach, assumed identity papers and escape plans. The royal couple with their children all disguised as common travellers, escaped from Paris. The king and queen had insisted that they travel with all needed comforts, so their coach was lumbering and slow. It required extra horses and changes and attracted attention.
At one change an alert patriot noticed an attractive but familiar woman who issued orders though dressed as a maid. He thought he recognized the queen and from a gold piece given as a tip recognized the king. This patriot Jacques Drouet sped ahead and reached the small town Varennes and alerted the people who confronted the king and queen on arrival. They had travelled over 200 miles and were just near the French-Austrian border and loyal troops ready to rescue them. But the rescue did not occur. A humiliated king and queen were forced to return to Paris over dusty roads over the course of the next four days. Frenchmen came from near and far to gaze and glare at the famous captives, on several occasions almost assaulting them. Later members of the assembly arrived and crowded into the coach with them.
When they arrived in Paris they met complete silence with all men keeping on their hats and no salutes or other sign of deference to the king. The weary travellers were caked in dust and sweat. As Campan drew the bath for Marie Antoinette, and Queen removed her hat and veil, both noticed the Queen’s blonde hair was now completely white from the fright and torment of the journey.
Downfall of Monarchy
After the disastrous flight to Varennes, Marie Antoinette at first worked with constitutional monarchist Barnave to try to restore royal prestige. However, hatred of the queen now rose to new levels.
Marie Antoinette began anew to seek aid from abroad to intervene in France and restore royal authority. Austria and Prussia threatened France on behalf of the royal family and France declared war on those powers in April 1792, again over the king’s veto. In June, the Tuileries palace was invaded and sacked by a mob, the king and queen held up to ridicule and humiliation but not otherwise harmed. At the same time, calls for volunteers arose under the cry “Patrie en Danger”, as Frenchmen were called to repel the invaders.
In July 1792, as Prussian armies invaded France, the Duke of Brunswick threatened the people of Paris that if any harm came to persons of the king or queen, serious vengeance would be exacted by the invaders on France. The proclamation was made public and caused a sensation in the country.
On August 10, 1792, the Tuileries palace was stormed by the populace, who sought refuge in the Assembly. The king and queen and their family were installed in the tiny reporter’s box, amid stifling heat, glares and heckling of the crowd. In that cage, they heard the reports of the fall of the Tuileries and massacre of the 900 Swiss guards who had stayed to defend them. They watched as treasures from the Tuileries were piled on the speaker’s desk including papers, jewels, precious objects of the royal family. They listened to the debates which voted to suspend and then end the monarchy. A Republic declared and the royal family imprisoned in the Temple fortress.
Reign of Terror
Other aristocrats were imprisoned at this same time. As the fortunes of French armies in the field waned the cry went up to kill traitors in their midst. Hundreds of aristocrats were massacred in the prisons in September 1792. The most famous victim was Madame Lamballe, close friend of Marie Antoinette who had returned to Paris to aid her in time of peril. Lamballe was summoned before a tribunal and when she failed to swear an oath against the queen, she was hacked to death by the mob, her head, breasts and genitals severed and mounted on pikes, and paraded before the Queen’s window in the Temple. The Reign of Terror had now begun.
The royal family was under close guard and now shorn of all their finery and servants and forced to live simply in the confines of the Temple fortress. But their peace was not to last.
In December 1792, King Louis XVI was summoned before the National Convention and tried for treason. He was convicted and on a close vote sentenced to death. In January 1793, Louis XVI was executed on the guillotine. In the two years that followed thousands more would be tried before revolutionary tribunals and similarly executed on the guillotine.
The Queen’s Fate
After her husband’s death, in July 1793, Marie Antoinette’s son was forcibly taken from her. The poor woman begged that her son be allowed to stay but she was powerless to change the will of the ministers. The boy was put under the care of Simon, a cobbler and one of the Commissaires of the Commune, and died of neglect within two years.
In September 1793, Marie Antoinette was separated from her daughter and sister in law. Now called “Widow Capet”, Marie was transferred to months of solitary confinement in the dank Conciergerie prison, where she was under twenty-four hour guard by revolutionaries who from behind their screen watched her every move. The Conciergerie prison was the antechamber to death. In this dank prison, she lost much weight and her eyesight began to fail, but she did not have long to live.
On October 14, the poor pallid woman was awoken at night and faced the Revolutionary Tribunal. The trial was a horror, with the Queen attacked more as a person than as a queen. Her own son was forced to testify that she abused him. The queen bravely replied to all charges and to this she said, “If I make no reply, it is because I cannot, I appeal to all mothers in this audience.”
Despite her eloquence, the verdict was never in doubt. Like the king, Marie was found guilty.
When she rode to her death on October 16, 1793, many gasped … for Marie Antoinette was just 38, but the crowd saw (as artist David sketched) an old hag in peasant garb, ragged and grey – a stark contrast to elegant and voluptuous Queen of Trianon, the child of fortune, she had been just 4 years earlier. Marie Antoinette’s hair had been roughly shorn, her with hands tied tight behind her back, as she rode in the garbage cart amid the crowd’s whistles and jeers. Yet, the poor woman sat straight and tried to retain her dignity. To the end, Marie Antoinette displayed a queen’s bearing and courage, in the face of all adversity.
After her final ordeal, the body of Marie Antoinette was harshly pushed on to the guillotine plank, her head placed in the vice and at noon the blade fell to loud cheers all round. In the words of a revolutionary organ, “Never has Piere Duchesne seen such joy as seeing that [expletive] whore’s head separated from her [expletive] crain’s neck”. Sanson held her bleeding head high for all to see. Later her head was throne in the cart between her legs. The body of Marie Antoinette was left on the grass before being dumped in an unmarked grave. So ended the life of once the most illustrious and glamorous woman in all Europe.
Cody
Im doing a research report on Marie. I found this site very useful. Thank you!
blue
I cried reading her biography…this is really sad..it’s so sad….especially her children…so so sad……
Duckie
One of her children, Marie Therese, did survive to adulthood. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie-Th%C3%A9r%C3%A8se_Charlotte_de_France for details.
Michaela
Her life and death is as interesting and sad as Mary, Queen of Scots, another misunderstood Queen. Neither queen did all she could have for her people – they were very interesting women and personalities but not very good rulers.
lexi
I have never really liked Marie Antoinette. She did say, “Let them eat cake!” because she was so clueless about the depression.
Clare
Actually she didn’t say “Let them eat cake!” at all. It amazes me that this myth persists. You are welcome to dislike Marie Antoinette, I would recommend that you do so on better grounds than you have just offered.
Donna
The lofe of Marie Antoinette is fascinating and tragic. Just imagine yourself going through the agony of having some of her children die, and her son being dragged away from her, let alone her husband being killed, and being locked in a prison to rot away and die. By the time she was beheaded, she could possibly thought of death as a welcome rescue from the life she was forced to live.
I have to question the violence of the time. The hackings, beheadings, and displaying the heads–and other body parts–on sticks, or arranging them in grotesque displays. Those people must have been psychotic. Has anyone done any research on these barbaric practices?
In the end, may Marie Antoinette rest in peace. Long live the Queen!
Eliana
i lyk Maries story , tho it was bittr-sweet
i would say more but im not supossd to be on
th computer. thanks so much for th info that
i needed for th report!!
Jonsdogs
this is the best website for marie antoinette i looked at all of them but this is the best
Lilmagpie
Okay, so I have been OBSESSED with history like my whole life and Marie Antoinette is amazing! Even though when she got married wasn’t her named change to Maria Antoina… Im just say’n! Anywho… I think that she was truly unfairly exucuted! If anyone should have been punished it should have been 1) Maria Theresa for not propaly educating Marie 2) Louis dad for being a jerk! 3) Louis’ grandpa for starting absolutism!! She was just misunderstood! And also yes, she did buy in extravagance, but that was how she was raised! I don’t think she really knew what was going on till it was to late! Lastly, this revolution had been brewing looong before Marie, it just so happened that they snapped when she was there!
If ya find any speeling mistakes you can keep them! 🙂
Sunny
I just watched the movie Marie Antoinette with Kirsten Dunst and that compelled me to study more about her. Pretty fascinating stuff, as a lot of history is. {Edited for relevance}
Madeleine
Wow, isnt this supposed to be comments about the biography? You girls should not post your religious beliefs on here, along with whether or not you saw the movie with Kirsten Dunst. I am an eighth grader from Arizona and to me, this whole debate that is going on through comments is unecessary. Just read the passage and post what you thought without including a whole life story. By the way, all you people that ignored the bickering and just said what you thought, good for you.
Furthermore, I am aware that I am kind of acting like a hypocrite because I interveined but it was just really annoying to read the comments. So all you people that think I should take my own advice, I know that I should. I just felt the need to express my opinion.
Lastly, I enjoyed the biography, it had alot of good, solid detail. It was a great information source for my biography scrapbook project I had to do. =)
Clare
Thanks Madeleine, it’s good to see some sense from someone so young 🙂 Anyone following the comments will notice that I am now editing them for relevance, if you post something unrelated to the article it will be edited and note a posted. It’s great to read the discussion and I’m please the article has been useful to you, but it’s more useful to all of us to keep the comments on topic.
Margi Seif
I was very impressed with the amount of information provided by this website on the child queen. We have been to Paris and throughout France several times, and each time, went away with the impression that Marie Antionette was considered, by the Frence people, to be like a virus that “infected” the noble country of France. Obviously, their children are being taught revisionist history – the tool of the guilt-ridden. If the true history is not taught, how can they judge or learn from past mistakes?
My hope is, that through your website, the children who tell us that they are doing reports on the last French queen, will put into prectice what they should have learned here about the damge of rumors, false judgement, mob rule mentality and the manipulative mechanacians of one or two mean-spirited persons.
lilmagpie
K, I have corrections to make to my previous comment!
Her name was originally Maria Antoina, and was changed to Marie Antoinette. I got kinda confused there. And When I said who should be blamed it was Louis’ grandfather for being a jerk and his great grandfather for starting absolutism!! I had forgotten about how Louis XV as Louis XVI’s grandfather!!
I also want to thank who wrote this because I used it for my research paper at school and it was SUPER helpful!
If you find any spelling mistakes you can keep them!! 🙂
Penelope
I am doing a report for famous women, and I decided to pick Marie Antoinette. Why?
French women are like stale chocolate. They have an appetizing appeal, when in reality it is hard & stale.
Although I did think Marie Antoinette would be of the same impression, I was wrong. She had a love for all things exotic… of which I do not. We love to hate her because she had a luxury we don’t. She had men stepping all over others for her, (only for a short period,) & she had all of France’s debt at her feet. I hate and admire her.
Penelope
Oh, I forgot to mention I am only in the fifth grade.
Lisa
Actually, Marie A. was a typically spoiled, over-indulged royal who really happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, historically speaking. She is not alone in her experience of, as a royal, being married off to a stranger at age 14, and probably this couple was not the only royal couple who had troubles sexually at such a young age. This was a pitiful aspect of life for most royals at that time.
Marie was young and foolish in many of her choices–her breach of protocol made many enemies, and her party-spirit lifestyle (which she had been warned about but to no avail), and her extravagence opened the door for the kinds of over-the-top accusations made against her. Again, during any other time in history, these accusations would probably have passed. But because of the brewing egalitarian radicalism that was spreading all over France, mixed with the country’s financial troubles, there was no hope for Marie and Louis.
Every revolution has to have a scapegoat for the people to rally against, and Marie was the scapegoat very much in the same way George III was in the American Revolution: real abuses were magnified to make the scapegoats seem even more wicked than they were, in order to stir up the public revolt.
emily steuber
I’m sorry to say there are several inaccuracies in this biography, and it is immensely over-glamourized.
Clare
Perhaps Emily, instead of merely saying there are inaccuracies it would be helpful to outline what those inaccuracies are? Otherwise your comment is practically useless …
lilly
Wow..this was really helpfull! Her death was so tragic, she did alot of good things for the people of Frace! It is really sad that she is remembered for the line, “let them eat cake” because its not true that she ever said that!! she did however do tons of charity work, and was somewhat aware of the condition france was in. On the other hand she was spending huge sums of money and puting france in detb (well at least adding to the debt)not only that but she also had built a tiny farm, and would “work” in it pretending to be a maid. this did upset many people. So i guess i can understand both sides of the story. France was at the time were a revolution was needed.. they had suffered enough because of there monarchs in the past and had had enough… But that suffering wasnt caused by marie. This to me is the tragic part..she had to die because of the Kings and Queens before her, the people of France took their anger out on her, and her children.
lilly
Opps I almost forgot to ask…what ever happened to Marie antoinette’s daughter?
barbara
as the saying goes money doesn’t buy happiness!!
xxlamexx
Who was the one that wrote this article?
Clare
The author is anonymous.
Brittany
I heard that Marie really didn’t die by beheading but by catching influenza during her time in prison?
Clare
No that’s not true Brittany.
Kermi
Hi,
I’ve watched the movie & read all the comments above.
One thing that everyone must keep in mind is that in that time period it was an acceptible action that the mob had done. The dismeberment, etc.
I agree that it was a horrible thing to do & in this age it would be unthinkable in most areas of the world. If you investigate/read/research other monarchies of that time, it wasn’t a strange thing to torture, mame & make the innocent say things that would make them be found guilty nor make the innocent seem quilty. Torture of the “unthinkable” for us today was common place in the times of the old days. Even today torture of different sorts are still carried out.
Marie was quite young to have been married off, as she was. Pressure from all sides on this young girl would make anyone crazy. It is sad that she had to endure the loss of her children, again that was a common thing then because of the lack of “our” medical knowledge.
Kudos, for all your opinions & thoughts.
P.S. the whole Jesus/Marie questions/doubts are really trival things to get defensive or not, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and everyone should respect others opinons & take them as such.
Enjoy your weekend.
victoria
A Queen at 14. Did she know what was to be expected from a Queen? Was she brought up to rule France? I’d like to know more about her background, not just her death. What was she like as a 14 year old child? And finally- why is there so much interest in just her and not Louie,
victoria
Also, was she that pretty? Every picture I have seen of her shows one ugly, blah face. Oh, her luscious endowed breasts cannot be seen.
Gloria castillo
this is a sad story
Deb
I have to agree with Lisa’s post of 4/22. She was in the wrong place at the wrong time with the wrong man – until maybe later when they came together as a couple, had their children, and began family life. I don’t think she was like Princess Diana because Diana went out of her way to come out of her palace and find out what the people needed – but Marie did not – for whatever reason. Maybe she was just too busy with her children or really didn’t care – no one will ever know for sure what her motives were. I’d be interested in finding about some prime sources for her motives. Were all her documents (letters, etc..) destroyed in the revolution? What strikes me as interesting is that so many people in their comments feel sorry for Marie at being married so young. Young marriages were extremely common at the time (not just in royal families) – if you weren’t married by 18 you were in danger of being the subject of gossip about why you were still single. Children in the 1700’s were not the children we know today. They were given responsibilities at a very young age compared to modern times. They were treated as adults from a very young age and girls often had their first babies as “teen moms”. When you think about the average age of death as being 40ish for middle class people – it kind of makes sense to marry young and have your children young. Also, when so many children died young – it made sense to start having them young and to have many of them so that you could have some survive to help do the work of the house and farm. I think that in our treatment of children in these modern times, we have actually allowed our young people stay “children” way too long and be less responsible and less able to adjust to the realities of how tough life really can be – but that’s a different topic.
Juniper
I just found this site after reading about her on wikipedia, after seeing the movie with Kirsten Dunst. I thought this site had better info than wikipedia and I am glad I found it, esp the part about the “necklace affair”……wasn’t there a movie about that?? Anyone remember the name, or am is that just wishful thinking??
I also wanted to add my 2 cents to the whole debate as to whether or not she was a “good person” No one who lives today really knows what she was honestly like, I’m sure most ref books of those days were not 100% accurate. I found her story sad, and was disappointed in the way there goverment endned things, but since I was not there for the events, I can’t really say that she was mean, or rude or “got what she deserved”. From what I’ve read and seen she seemed to have been someone who was kind and loving. Interesting bit about whether or not the French still hate them today…. that is something I would like to know!
Clare
Yes there was a movie – The Affair of the Necklace (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0242252/). Hilary Swank played Jeanne de La Motte, and Joley Richardson was Antoinette.
courtney
Ummm.. i feel very sad for marie antoinette. for the life she had to receive at a very young age. lost and unaware of her true fate.im glad that she went through these things to let us know that being royalty isnt always what you expect. and that it comes with sacrifices and consequences just as much as anything else would. i feel she play her positoin as queen as well as she could and that she did a great job! and for that i praise her for. i also feel anyone in her positoin would of had the same fate.. but they wouldnt of been able to play the role as great as she did.. soo really what im trying to say is that noone is perfect royalty or not were all human and made to make mistakes and go through pain and suffering. nd life is never fair even for a queen..and for that being said ..LONG LIVE THE QUEEN!!!!!:) because she did her best.. something i kno i wouldnt have the power and strength to even imagine doing.Thank you Marie..for doing your best. thanx thats all i got to sayy.. 😛
-Court
Mishelle
Ironically, I took a silly quiz on facebook in which it stated that I was like Marie Antoinnette in a past life. I became intrigued and stumbled onto this Biography. I found this Biography about Marie Antoinnette quite interesting and disturbing at the same time. It is sad to know that society plays such a devastating end to someone who was trying to enjoy life as she wished. She probably wanted to taste life and all it had to offer. Who really wants to be quiet and reserved all of the time? I am guessing that she was certain of herself and wasn’t concerned as to what people thought of her because she knew she was a good person who cared for the people who were loyal to her. Too bad she was scrutinized and seperated from her children. This makes me think of how often society does this in today’s time. Makes one wonder if we are treating someone unkindly and unfairly as well.
Fabian
I find Marie Antoinette to be the most fascinating woman in France’s history and there are definitely many interesting women in that arena. It is very unfortunate however that the image that is most commonly held of her is that which was created by her detractors. She is incredibly enigmatic precisely because so much false information was spread about her both during her life and after her death. I’ve been reading about her for years and always feel as if I never quite get to know her. Visiting the palace at Versailles, and the Petit Trianon in particular, is about as close as I’ve ever felt I could come to her and her world.
Katey
I agree, Marie Antoinette is so fascinating and so incredibly interesting.
I’m only 16 and i beleive, I too, will one day pursue my dreams and visit Versailles and hopefully follow my inspiration (Marie Antoinette) and move to France where i can visit le château de Versailles as much as possible.
I love Marie Antoinette and i love France and this is what keeps me motivated to do well in my life.
JJ
Last night I watched the 1938 version of “Marie Antionette” (Turner Classic Movies) with Norma Shearer and found it to be very historically accurate. It gave a lot more detail and perspective than the Kirsten Dunst movie. I guess I should say, “historically accurate as to what I have read.” I have found that “true history” as another mentioned is really all biased by the writer. You can put whatever spin on it that you want. Many who read her biography and feel sorry for her haven’t put themselves in the shoes of the starving peasants, who saw her opulence but couldn’t even feed their children. If they read the stories from their perspective I’m sure they could see why “enough was enough.”
cotton
What happened to her daughter? I don’t find much about her above. Thanks.
sophia
Marie-Antoinette really was a wonderful woman. I think her peasants should think of when she gave them money and food and jewels! What do you think?
love
Sophia Pepper
P.S.Send your reply to svpepper@gmail.com.
sophia_rythm
really beautiful
wndrfully written
hats off
June Hess
Whoever wrote this should do some further research. Marie Antoinette was not her mother’s favorite daughter. In fact, they didn’t have much of a relationship at all. I don’t know if I should read any further. Who knows what else is incorrect. Does anyone review this stuff before it is put out there for unsuspecting readers to accept as factual?
Clare
Hi June,
This article represents the work and the opinions of the author. You are welcome to write and publish your own account of Marie Antoinette’s life if you wish, many others have done so. It is, as it always is with material published on the internet or on paper, the responsibility of the reader to evaluate its accuracy and make their own judgment, as you have done.
Thanks for your contribution.
Sasha
I am just wondering, do the French still dislike Marie Antoinette? I find her story to be moving and find her to be one of the most misunderstood people in history so I was planning to get a tattoo in her honor. If I were to go to France would they look at me in disgust? Not that France was that great when I visited there anyway. I just don’t want to offend anyone, not that it’s really going to change my mind because I really want this tattoo. Anyone have an opinion on this?
indie
i recently did a family tree and found out that my family was related to king louis… Its pretty cool!
Tony
After channel surfing, I came across the Marie Antoinette movie on Sundance, and it pushed me to want to know more about this woman. I found this article very informative. The one complaint I would have is that it is riddled with spelling and grammatical errors. If there are indeed children utilizing this site for research related to school projects, I feel it is important that it be further reviewed and edited as necessary. In this age of “text speak”, it is vital that we lead by example and demonstrate for the wee ones the proper use of the English language…and no, it does not need to be the King’s English.
Clare
Thanks for your comment, but as I have said numerous times, most recently only days ago, I am not particularly concerned with the “wee ones” proper use of the English language. Let the parents and the teachers correct the use of English in their home and classrooms. This is merely a small website built for the purpose of discussing the life and times of Marie Antoinette. It is not to be held up as a paragon of English grammar, spelling, or proper usage, and makes no such claims. We are not responsible for how the article is used and if students are using web resources they should be taught to use them with caution – that is also the job of parents and teachers.
The article will not be edited unless the author requests it. S/he has not in the more than ten years that it has been part of this site.
As an aside, “text speak” is a form of English, it is not improper nor is it wrong. You may like to consider that and perhaps take the time to become familiar with it as I imagine the wee ones will speak their own versions of English whether you like it or not. If there are any other pedants out there concerned with the sorry state of the English language, please take your comments to a forum/blog/website on that subject. You may use this article as an example of the way that English is going to hell in a hand basket if you wish. I expect you would do so in exemplary English – although how you define that beats me.
On the other hand, if you wish to discuss the life and time of Marie Antoinette, welcome and we thank you for your input.
b_marie
uhhhmm… i believe that marie was a great person, young and dumb? possibly. but you name me a 14 year old that knows how to run a country efficiently. not very many.
Bonnie
I found this information very useful for the essay I have to write about her. She is my favorite historical monarch to learn about and I find her very interesting. I personally think this information was written fine and these people, whoever they are, are just being stupid when talking about the correct form of English and the writing skills used. When writing a paper, like Iam doing this is fine because the writing skills in the information don’t matter because your taking the idea from the information and putting them in your own words and using the facts. The only way the grammar and punctuation from here would matter for an essay being written, would be if you were copying this. Which is plagiarism and you can’t do when wrting an essay. Teachers check that. Also, not everyone uses the “txt language.” It’s only used when sending a txt or in instant messanging. You need to get your facts straight. A little “txt language” for you- B.T.W. nobody sais “wee ones!” Who are the “wee ones” your talking about, because in my book “wee ones” means young as in, pre-school young and last time I checked, they aren’t writing essays and projects about historical monarchs around the world. That would be middle school and up, and I take that offensively to be called a “wee one!” How would you like to be called ” old farts” because you waste your time talking crap about the english language and how this information was written. That’s what people with no life do. Instead wasting away your useless life commenting this crap about a perfectly fine thing of information , why don’t you just make your own. People like that annoy the crap out of me, especially since I happened to love this. Anyways I think it was good,a dn I’ll be using this for my research paper, which I’ll probably get an A on.